Will Coral Springs Injury Lawyer Explain Assault And Battery Claims?

If you thought that all personal injury accidents are result of some unintentional negligence, then you are wrong. Some take place due to intentional harm for instance assault and battery injury accidents. Filed often in civil courts, these cases take place when someone intentionally harms the plaintiff for revenge, jealousy or any other motive. It is best to contact Coral Springs Injury Lawyer and let them handle such claims.

Defining Assault: Let us first of all define assault for you with the help of a qualified battery and assault attorney. Legally, assault means any act of harm that is reasonably conducted to hurt someone. For instance, when someone deliberately says that he is going to shoot someone and he or she actually does it, then it is a case of assault.

Defining Battery: Now, it is time to understand battery tort with the help of a qualified Coral Springs Injury Attorney. Battery tort is any direct or indirect act that harms someone with an intention. For instance, if someone deliberately throws a stone at someone to harm, then it is considered as a battery tort.

Damage Compensation for Assault and Battery Tort Cases: According to Coral Springs Injury Lawyer, in such cases the plaintiff can sue the defendant for medical expenses, future medical expenses, loss of wages, loss of earning capacity, pain and suffering and loss of enjoyment from life.

Common Defenses used in Assault and Battery Tort Cases: Coral Springs Injury Lawyer knows that it is equally important to understand the common defenses used in an assault and battery tort case. Following are the common defenses used in such cases:

• Privilege: Privilege is a defense used in assault and battery tort cases majorly by police officers who tend to use force when arresting someone. They are privileged to use force at that time and any accusation against them can be proved invalid on the basis of privilege and need or hour to arrest the accused.

• Consent: Secondly, when there is a situation when the plaintiff was aware of possibility of harm in a certain act and yet performs it and gets injured then the defendant defends himself or herself on account of consent. Meaning that the plaintiff performed the act with consent and therefore he or she can't sue the defendant for the same because prior warning was issued.

• Self-Defense: Lastly, a number of defendants tend to defend themselves stating that the act of assault was merely an act of self-defense. In other words, if assault or battery is done in order to save oneself from the harmful act of someone else, then it can be regarded as a reasonable defense.

As a conclusion, we can state that hiring an experienced assault and battery tort attorney will be the best way out to deal such a case with confidence. For more information visit here: Drucker Law Offices